Michigan voters will consider two harmful wildlife measures on November 4th

Wolf in Denali National Park, photo by Ken Miller

November 12, 2014 Update: Great news for wolves! On November 4, Michigan voters rejected Proposals 1 and 2, taking a stand for the state's native wildlife and its citizens' right to make their voices heard. Thank you to all who helped spread the word and contributed to this important victory! --editor

On November 4, Michigan voters will have an opportunity to weigh in on two measures— Proposals 1 and 2—that, if passed, would harm the state’s small, vulnerable wolf population and prevent the public from weighing in on important wildlife protection and management decisions.

Proposal 1, if enacted, would subject Michigan’s wolves to trophy hunts.

At present, Michigan has around 650 wolves—perhaps fewer—and the state’s population lost federal Endangered Species Act (ESA) protections in 2012. Wolves play a vital role in the healthy functioning of the state’s ecosystems, as they are keystone predators that balance prey populations, with ecological benefits that cascade down the food chain.

Trophy hunting of wolves is an unnecessary blood sport that serves no legitimate wildlife management objective, and is not used to produce meat.

Wolves may already be legally killed in response to concerns about conflicts with livestock, pets or humans; there is no scientific or public safety justification for allowing a trophy hunt.

Moreover, wolf trophy hunts may involve gruesome capture and kill methods (as has been the case in neighboring states), threatening not only the population as a whole, but also the welfare of individual wolves and non-target animals.

Proposal 2 would also threaten wolves, in addition to other imperiled wildlife species across the state.

The measure would authorize the Natural Resources Commission—a board of political appointees—to add animals to the state’s list of game species that may be hunted without approval from the public or elected legislators.

The Commission is subject to political pressures and is not accountable to the public, despite the fact that the people of Michigan value and enjoy their wildlife and natural resources, and should therefore be included in relevant decision-making processes.

It is critical that voters put a stop to Proposal 2 on November 4, to protect both their wildlife and their right to participate in the decisions that affect them. 

--CB

Michigan voters, show your support for wolves and public participation in wildlife management by voting NO on Proposals 1 and 2, and spread the word about the importance of defeating these irresponsible measures.

Image: Wikipedia

Post a comment

Experts

Azzedine Downes,IFAW President and CEO
President and Chief Executive Officer
Beth Allgood, Country Director, United States
Country Director, United States
Cynthia Milburn, Director, Animal Welfare Outreach & Education
Senior Advisor, Policy Development
Dr. Maria (Masha) N. Vorontsova, Senior Advisor to the IFAW Marine Conservation
Senior Advisor to the IFAW Marine Conservation Program
Faye Cuevas, Esq.
Senior Vice President
Grace Ge Gabriel, Regional Director, Asia
Regional Director, Asia
Jason Bell, Vice President for Conservation and Animal Welfare
Vice President for Conservation and Animal Welfare
Matt Collis, Director, International Policy
Director, International Policy
Patrick Ramage, Program Director, Whales
Program Director, Marine Conservation
Sonja Van Tichelen, Vice President of International Operations
Vice President of International Operations
Staci McLennan, Director, EU Office
Director, EU Office
Tania McCrea-Steele, Project Lead, Global Wildlife Cybercrime
Project Lead, Global Wildlife Cybercrime