Thousands cry out online against bear farming in China

An asiatic black bear. c. IFAWIn December 1996, I witnessed eight Asiatic black bears walk to freedom at the first bear sanctuary China had ever seen, set up by the International Fund for Animal Welfare.

Fifteen years later, a Chinese bear farm associated company is trying to expand the cruelty-plagued industry by applying for an initial public offering (IPO).

Have animal welfare campaigns achieved nothing in the past decade and half? Some might wonder. Isn’t there any progress in ending animal cruelty in China?

I am angry of course about the audacity that a company based on animal cruelty dares to go public. However, I am also pleased to see that the IPO application has generated a new wave of public condemnation against the practice that inflict pain and suffering to animals represented by the bear farming industry. This time, the outcry came almost entirely from Chinese citizens. 

In the past three weeks, the fierce debate online has attracted millions of people who expressed overwhelming opposition to the IPO.

A well-known TV celebrity Zhang Quanling wrote on her Sina microblog: “If Guizhentang, which extracts bile from live bears, is listed publicly, the number of tortured bears will increase from 400 to 1,200. Guizhentang says that its tubeless bile-extraction methods don’t cause the bears pain. But, heavens, can it really be painless to be confined in such a narrow space every day? Is it really painless having an open wound that never heals? We have long been able to artificially make the active ingredient in bear bile or to replace it with herbal medicines, such as rhubarb. Why do we have to hurt the bears?”

This Weibo post was forwarded 38,089 times and as many as 7,710 people commented on it.

Another microblogger using the name “Southern Barbarian” said: “Businesses should have a conscience. I believe that anyone who has witnessed the drawing of bile from live bears will oppose this horrific industry. It is OK to raise animals for slaughter, but it is not OK to maltreat them. By maltreating animals we blur the basic distinction between right and wrong.”

“We can’t expect every company to be imbued with a sense of morality, but we have to take the initiative and uphold a minimum level of ethical standards for the market,” wrote a market analyst. “If these kinds of companies all go public, then that’s encouraging the mistreatment of animals, human greed, and moral depravity.”

The spotlight on bear farming came at a great time as the country’s legislative bodies—the National People’s Congress and the National People Political Consultative Committee--are about to convene their respective annual conferences in March. Last year’s conferences already saw an unprecedented number of proposals on wildlife conservation and animal welfare. I anticipate that there will be more proposals this year calling to end bear farming and promulgate legislation to prevent cruelty to animals. 

It may take the international animal welfare campaigners to expose the cruel practice of bear farming. But to end the suffering of animals in China will depend on the citizens of China to speak up against animal cruelty and pass laws that will uphold moral standards and govern human behavior in how animals are treated.

Facts about bear farming:

  1. Bear farming is a cruel and unnecessary practice that causes tremendous physical and mental suffering to bears. Both methods of bile extraction (catheter and free dripping) leaves open wounds in the bear’s body for as long as the bear lives, causing diseases, infections and pain.
  2. Bile bears are kept in small cages, deprived of the ability to exhibit natural behavior. They live in constant stress and fear.
  3. To extract the maximum amount of bile, bears are deprived of food and water. Exams of the bears rescued from the bile farms show that majority of the bears are severely malnourished.
  4. It’s tragic that bear farming is allowed in China; there’s no anti-cruelty legislation to prevent the pain and suffering inflicted on these poor animals.
  5. Animal ingredients make up only 3 percent of ingredients used in traditional Chinese medicine. There are alternatives to bear bile as well, such as herbs and synthetics.
  6. Excessive use and promotion of products obtained from cruelty to animals, damages the reputation of TCM worldwide and prevents its healthy development.

-- GG

Comments: 4

 
Anonymous
2 years ago

It is taking so long for this horrid practice to be stopped. I believe the only way to stop it is to convince the Chinese government to pass a law. The Chinese people must be educated! I started a petition on Care2.com 'stop bear bile extraction' but it is slowing at 799 after a week, i was hoping for 10.000 people signing quickly.
Both my wife (a Chinese woman) and myself have watched two programmes on Hong Kong TV showing these bears; we were saddened by the scale and suffering!
Please people, do what ever you can!!

 
Anonymous
2 years ago

It is really sad and disgusting that CHINA still does this, I am very suprised and Happy that it is some of the Chinese people who are speaking against this, I really hope that the idiot that thinks Bear Bile is still needed will look into other ways, it's 2012 now, ANIMAL ABUSE should NOT BE TOLERATED ANYMORE!!!!!

 
Anonymous
2 years ago

I have supported Animals Asia because of this appalling trade and will continue to support them - and you in everything you do. Brave lady

 
Anonymous
2 years ago

Perhaps if the Chinese people were aware of how they are perceives by many thousands of people in the rest of the world because of what they do to all animals to collect ingredients for their archaic TCM they would abandon it and join the 21st century. How are they perceived? As sadistic brutal and depraved.

Post a comment

Experts

Azzedine Downes,Executive Vice President for International Operations, VP of P
President and Chief Executive Officer
Céline Sissler-Bienvenu, Director, France and Francophone Africa
Director, France and Francophone Africa
Dr. Elsayed Ahmed Mohamed, Regional Director, Middle East and North Africa
Regional Director, Middle East and North Africa
Dr. Maria (Masha) N. Vorontsova, Regional Director, Russia & CIS
Regional Director, Russia & CIS
Grace Ge Gabriel, Regional Director, Asia
Regional Director, Asia
Isabel McCrea, Regional Director, Oceania
Regional Director, Oceania
Jeffrey Flocken, Regional Director, North America
Regional Director, North America
Kelvin Alie, Programme Director, Wildlife Trade
Programme Director, Wildlife Trade
Peter Pueschel, Director, International Environmental Agreements
Director, International Environmental Agreements
Campaigner, Germany
Campaigner, Germany
Tania McCrea-Steele, Campaigns and Enforcement Manager, IFAW UK
Campaigns and Enforcement Manager, IFAW UK
Vivek Menon, Director of IFAW partner, Wildlife Trust of India
Regional Director, South Asia