New Poll Shows an Overwhelming Majority of Chinese Public Supports Ban on Tiger Trade

Wednesday, 30 January, 2008
Yarmouth Port, Mass
The Chinese public supports the ban on tiger trade and stands ready to pitch in to save wild tigers, according to the results of a new opinion poll released today.
The face-to-face survey of 1,880 people in Beijing, Chengdu, Guangzhou, Guilin, Harbin, Kunming and Shanghai was conducted by Horizon Key, one of China’s pre-eminent public polling companies.  Respondents, who statistically represent the entire adult populations of these cities, were asked questions about their use of tiger products, their preferences for products from wild versus farmed tigers and their attitudes toward conservation of wild tigers and China’s 1993 tiger-trade ban.
Ninety three percent of the respondents support China’s tiger-trade ban.  Among those, 77 percent felt that keeping the ban was important for China’s image.  An overwhelming 95 percent said that they would take action to save wild tigers, including abstaining from the use of tiger products.
“The results of this survey present the strikingly clear message that most Chinese people care so much about wild tigers that they are willing to change behaviors that threaten survival of tigers in the wild, said Judy Mills of Save The Tiger Fund, which commissioned the study.  “With this strong support from the Chinese people, wild tigers can survive and thrive.”    
However, the survey also reported that 43 percent of those polled had consumed what they thought were tiger products, and most had done so since China’s 1993 tiger-trade ban was put in place.  Among those consumers, 71 percent said they prefer products from wild tigers, while less than eight percent said they favored products from farmed tigers.
At present, businessmen in China bred some 5,000 tigers in the hope that the 14-year trade ban will be lifted.  These factory-farm owners are lobbying the government to lift the ban, which would clear the last hurdle to their making huge profits from the sale of tonic wine made with tiger bones.  Meanwhile, tiger experts fear that reopening trade in tiger products from any source will cause a disastrous increase in poaching of the estimated 3,400−4,400 tigers remaining in the wild.  For this reason, some say the fate of wild tigers rests with China’s maintaining and enforcing its trade ban.
“The preference for products from wild tigers documented by this survey confirm our fears that lifting China’s ban will send the message to poachers that it’s open season on tigers, which would be disastrous for wild tigers,” said Grace Gabriel of the International Fund for Animal Welfare.
The primary use of tiger products in traditional Chinese medicine is to remedy arthritic conditions.  The traditional Chinese medicine community has won praise from conservationists for finding and embracing effective alternatives.  Those petitioning China’s government to lift the ban are businessmen who stand to make millions of dollars from selling tiger-bone wine for tonic purposes.
The 172 countries that are members of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) decided in June that tigers should not be farmed for trade in their products.

Post a comment

Press Contact

Lynn A. Levine (IFAW, Headquarters)
Contact mobile:
(508) 744-2185
Contact email:


Azzedine Downes,IFAW President and CEO
President and Chief Executive Officer
Céline Sissler-Bienvenu, Director, France and Francophone Africa
Director, France and Francophone Africa
Dr. Elsayed Ahmed Mohamed, Regional Director, Middle East and North Africa
Regional Director, Middle East and North Africa
Dr. Joseph Okori
Regional Director, Southern Africa and Program Director, Landscape Conservation
Dr. Maria (Masha) N. Vorontsova, Regional Director, Russia & CIS
Regional Director, Russia & CIS
Faye Cuevas, Esq.
Senior Vice President
Grace Ge Gabriel, Regional Director, Asia
Regional Director, Asia
Executive Vice President
Executive Vice President
Matt Collis, Director, International Policy
Director, International Policy
Peter LaFontaine, Campaigns Manager, IFAW Washington, D.C.
Campaigns Manager, IFAW Washington, D.C.
Rikkert Reijnen, Program Director, Wildlife Crime
Program Director, Wildlife Crime
Country Representative, Germany
Country Representative, Germany
Staci McLennan, Director, EU Office
Director, EU Office
Tania McCrea-Steele, Project Lead, Global Wildlife Cybercrime
Project Lead, Global Wildlife Cybercrime
Vivek Menon, Director of IFAW partner, Wildlife Trust of India
Senior Advisor to the CEO on Strategic Partnerships & Philanthropy