No thrill for the kill of polar bears

Earlier this year, I had the opportunity to testify before a subcommittee of the US House of Representatives’ Committee on Natural Resources regarding a bill introduced by Representative Don Young (R-AK). Young’s bill, HR 991, seeks to amend the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 (MMPA) to allow the importation of polar bear trophies taken in sport hunts in Canada before the date the polar bear was determined to be a threatened species under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). 

This political maneuvering would allow for 41 hunters whose import permits were not approved before the ESA listing date to import their trophies from Canada into the United States. Last week, the bill reached the next step in a thankfully prolonged process—the Natural Resources Committee markup.   

Although disappointingly neither the committee members nor the Fish and Wildlife Service offered any objections to the bill, Representative Garamendi of California tried to lessen the extent of damage this bill could do. He offered an amendment that would place a time cap of twelve months on the amended MMPA language. If this had been agreed to, the MMPA would revert back to its original language after a year had passed.

Unfortunately, Representative Young, with the help of Chairman Doc Hastings of Washington, was able to get this amendment thrown out, which makes me wonder what Representative Don Young’s true intentions are for the future of polar bear protection. Although he was not successful, I applaud Representative Garamendi’s attempt to prevent prolonged exploitation of this loophole.

Like I said during my testimony, and it still rings true today, HR 991 fundamentally undermines the critical relationship between the protections that species presently receive under the ESA and the MMPA. Banning the import of endangered species is one of the best tools we have in the U.S. to protect polar bears abroad.  We cannot stop Americans from going to other countries and killing endangered species, but we can remove the enticement to do so. 

Hopefully by not being able to bring trophies back home, the thrill of the kill is taken away. As the bill makes its way through the House and the Senate, we hope that our government will keep in mind that polar bears are already standing on thin ice. The short-term special interests of a small, select politically well-connected group of hunters must not take precedence over the long-term conservation efforts of one of our most beloved and iconic species.


Comments: 2

6 years ago

[...] week, I shared with you news regarding the mark-up of HR991—legislation which seeks to allow the importation of polar bear trophies, circumventing the ban [...]

6 years ago

How can we stop the USA killing some poor innocent polar bears when we cannot stop them going to other countries and killing untold numbers of humans?

Post a comment


Azzedine Downes,IFAW President and CEO
President and Chief Executive Officer
Beth Allgood, Country Director, United States
Country Director, United States
Cynthia Milburn, Director, Animal Welfare Outreach & Education
Senior Advisor, Policy Development
Dr. Maria (Masha) N. Vorontsova, Regional Director, Russia & CIS
Regional Director, Russia & CIS
Faye Cuevas, Esq.
Senior Vice President
Grace Ge Gabriel, Regional Director, Asia
Regional Director, Asia
Jason Bell, Vice President for Conservation and Animal Welfare
Vice President for Conservation and Animal Welfare
Matt Collis, Director, International Policy
Director, International Policy
Patrick Ramage, Program Director, Whales
Program Director, Marine Conservation
Peter LaFontaine, Campaigns Manager, IFAW Washington, D.C.
Campaigns Manager, IFAW Washington, D.C.
Sonja Van Tichelen, Vice President of International Operations
Vice President of International Operations
Staci McLennan, Director, EU Office
Director, EU Office
Tania McCrea-Steele, Project Lead, Global Wildlife Cybercrime
Project Lead, Global Wildlife Cybercrime