Polar Bears Need Conservation, Not Politics

In January, as hordes of new Members of Congress were being sworn into the House of Representatives, one Congressional veteran, Congressman Don Young (R-Alaska) saw the shift in power as an opportunity and introduced a bill aimed at overturning the listing of the polar bear as an endangered species under the Endangered Species Act (ESA).

Congressman Young introduced his bill because the endangered listing prohibits American trophy hunters from importing the carcasses of the polar bears that they kill in Canada. IFAW opposes the importation of polar bear trophies – as it would the importation of any hunting trophies made from animals under threat of extinction. But Congressman Young’s bill, if passed, could set a dangerous precedent for all species, not just the polar bear.

The ESA, signed into law by President Nixon in 1973, set forth a comprehensive strategy to protect endangered and threatened species and the ecosystems upon which they depend. Under the Act, wildlife experts within the Federal government rely on the best available science to determine whether a species is in danger of extinction.

In 2008, after lengthy deliberation, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) determined that the polar bear was threatened with extinction, primarily due to the effects of climate change and the melting of the sea-ice upon which polar bears depend. That decision lead to a number of direct conservation benefits for the species including the protection of critical habitat in Alaska and the ban on imports of polar bear trophies.

But if Congressman Young gets his way, the careful scientific reasoning and decision-making process undertaken by FWS would all be for naught. This bill’s successful passage would set a tragic precedent, potentially opening a floodgate of Congressional action aimed at overturning endangered species listings for political purposes.

Battles over Congressman Young’s wanton disregard for science when science doesn’t fit within his pre-conceived notions about the “value” of killing endangered species may end up being one of the first waged in a war over Federal protection of endangered species. Unless we remain steadfast in our defense of the ESA, any number of species may be sacrificed by unrepentant Members of Congress who place exploitative special interests above the interests of the vast majority of Americans who value wildlife and want to see endangered species protected.

Decisions whether to list species as endangered or threatened must be made by scientists and other experts, not by those few Members of Congress who are all too willing to sacrifice the long term recovery of endangered species to the whims of wealthy American trophy-hunters looking to bag one of the Arctic’s last remaining great white bears before they disappear forever.

--NH

Comments: 3

 
Anonymous
2 years ago

[...] wasn’t expecting the bombastic attack that proceeded to come at me from the Chair of the Hearing, Rep. Don Young from Alaska and another Member of Congress from Louisiana, Rep. Jeff [...]

 
Anonymous
2 years ago

[...] after the species was listed as threatened under the US Endangered Species Act on May 15, 2008. This is the second time Congressman Young from Alaska has tried to pass this bill, and there is a good reason it didn’t pass the first time: it undermines America’s vital [...]

 
Anonymous
3 years ago

[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by action4ifaw and christimaree wishart, Kathe Garbrick. Kathe Garbrick said: RT @action4ifaw: AnimalWire.org - Polar Bears Need Conservation, Not Politics: http://bit.ly/eboFu8 #conservation #congress #extinction [...]

Post a comment

Experts

Azzedine Downes,Executive Vice President for International Operations, VP of P
President and Chief Executive Officer
Céline Sissler-Bienvenu, Director, France and Francophone Africa
Director, France and Francophone Africa
Dr. Elsayed Ahmed Mohamed, Regional Director, Middle East and North Africa
Regional Director, Middle East and North Africa
Dr. Maria (Masha) N. Vorontsova, Regional Director, Russia & CIS
Regional Director, Russia & CIS
Grace Ge Gabriel, Regional Director, Asia
Regional Director, Asia
Isabel McCrea, Regional Director, Oceania
Regional Director, Oceania
Jeffrey Flocken, Regional Director, North America
Regional Director, North America
Kelvin Alie, Programme Director, Wildlife Trade
Programme Director, Wildlife Trade
Peter Pueschel, Director, International Environmental Agreements
Director, International Environmental Agreements
Campaigner, Germany
Campaigner, Germany
Tania McCrea-Steele, Campaigns and Enforcement Manager, IFAW UK
Campaigns and Enforcement Manager, IFAW UK
Vivek Menon, Director of IFAW partner, Wildlife Trust of India
Regional Director, South Asia