International
Africa
Australia
Canada
Deutschland
Español
European Union
France
Nederland
United Kingdom
United States
Россия
中国
日本語Illegal trade in tigers undermines China’s implementation of CITES
Thursday, May 31, 2007
The Hague, Netherlands
Grace Gabriel, IFAW’s Asia Regional Director and key player in the tiger
farming debate, said of the report’s findings, “Tigers play a vital role in our
ecosystem and are key to Asia’s wildlife heritage. Their endangerment is a call
for us to focus on long-term, viable conservation strategies rather than ways to
make a quick dollar.”
The report highlights the imminent threats to tigers in the wild as a direct result of the large scale commercial breeding of tigers on so-called tiger farms. Investigators found evidence in support of observations detailed in the CITES Secretariat’s China tiger mission report that wine produced on the tiger farms in tiger shaped bottles are indeed promoted and sold as tiger bone-based wine on site, on company brochures and on Web sites.
The IFAW report also concurs with the Secretariat’s assessment that tiger farming as an “industry” is the result of a bad business decision. According to one tiger farm owner cited in the mission report, the decision to breed tigers for trade after the 1993 trade ban was “a speculative business exercise in the hope that the ban would be temporary.”
That commercial gain is the goal of these farms is clear. Because the breeding strategy on these farms is to maximize “production,” these farm bred tigers are genetically compromised and cannot be released in the wild. At the same time, tiger farm owners are engaging in the stockpiling of tiger carcasses and the production and trade of tiger parts, all the while pressuring the Chinese government to re-open the tiger trade in order to alleviate the financial burden of growing populations of farmed tigers.
The tolerance of any illegal trade in tiger parts in China calls into question China’s commitment to the implementation of the convention and compromises China’s compliance with the recommendations of the CITES CoP.
“Farming tigers for trade will rekindle demand that has been successfully contained by China’s domestic ban and public awareness efforts by the Chinese government,” says Gabriel,. “Increased demand will only stimulate the poaching of tigers in the wild which costs significantly less than raising a farmed tiger. Bullets are cheap.”
Raising thousands of tigers has strained these farming facilities financially, but rather than acknowledging the failure of the tiger farm as a bad business decision, investors are attempting to shift the financial burden to the international public at large, and expecting the world to accept the loss of wild tigers as a consequence.
The report highlights the imminent threats to tigers in the wild as a direct result of the large scale commercial breeding of tigers on so-called tiger farms. Investigators found evidence in support of observations detailed in the CITES Secretariat’s China tiger mission report that wine produced on the tiger farms in tiger shaped bottles are indeed promoted and sold as tiger bone-based wine on site, on company brochures and on Web sites.
The IFAW report also concurs with the Secretariat’s assessment that tiger farming as an “industry” is the result of a bad business decision. According to one tiger farm owner cited in the mission report, the decision to breed tigers for trade after the 1993 trade ban was “a speculative business exercise in the hope that the ban would be temporary.”
That commercial gain is the goal of these farms is clear. Because the breeding strategy on these farms is to maximize “production,” these farm bred tigers are genetically compromised and cannot be released in the wild. At the same time, tiger farm owners are engaging in the stockpiling of tiger carcasses and the production and trade of tiger parts, all the while pressuring the Chinese government to re-open the tiger trade in order to alleviate the financial burden of growing populations of farmed tigers.
The tolerance of any illegal trade in tiger parts in China calls into question China’s commitment to the implementation of the convention and compromises China’s compliance with the recommendations of the CITES CoP.
“Farming tigers for trade will rekindle demand that has been successfully contained by China’s domestic ban and public awareness efforts by the Chinese government,” says Gabriel,. “Increased demand will only stimulate the poaching of tigers in the wild which costs significantly less than raising a farmed tiger. Bullets are cheap.”
Raising thousands of tigers has strained these farming facilities financially, but rather than acknowledging the failure of the tiger farm as a bad business decision, investors are attempting to shift the financial burden to the international public at large, and expecting the world to accept the loss of wild tigers as a consequence.
Post a comment