2008年6月23日
(Washington, D.C.) - Today, the United States Supreme Court announced its decision to hear arguments regarding the U.S. Navy’s use of sonar in ongoing training exercises through 2009. The underlying lawsuit was brought by a coalition of conservation organizations led by the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC). The other groups include the International Fund for Animal Welfare, the League for Coastal Protection, Cetacean Society International, and Ocean Futures Society and its president and founder Jean-Michel Cousteau.
Following is a statement by Joel Reynolds, senior attorney and director of NRDC’s Marine Mammal program:
“Today’s decision was anticipated, and we have already begun to prepare for Supreme Court review.
“It’s clear both that high intensity military sonar can injure and kill whales, dolphins, and other marine life and that the Navy can reduce the risk of this harm by commonsense safeguards without compromising our military readiness. These have been the unanimous conclusions of every court that has considered this issue, even after President Bush in January sought unsuccessfully to intervene on the Navy’s behalf.
“Today’s order means that the Supreme Court will now itself consider the matter, and, as we have done repeatedly in this and other sonar cases, we will respond vigorously to the Navy’s appeal.”
Following is a statement by Jeffrey Flocken, Washington, DC director of the International Fund for Animal Welfare:
“High intensity sonar and other manmade noise pose a serious threat not
just to whales and other marine mammals but to the entire web of life in the
ocean.”
メディア関係者のお問い合わせ先:
Brandon Frazier (IFAW, United States)
Tel: 1 (202) 536-1907
Email: bfrazier@ifaw.org
Elizabeth Heyd (NRDC, Washington)
Tel: 1 (202) 289-2424
Daniel Hinerfeld (NRDC, Santa Monica)
Tel: 1 (310) 434-2303
Abby Berman (The Rosen Group)
Tel: 1 (212) 255-8455
Email: abby@rosengrouppr.com













